OK, I ain't got th' smarts ta argue with no one on thet thar Kantorian set theory, nur none a thet thar other hah level Filosofikal stuff en nonsense. Ner wether no aktual in-feye-nite tem-por-ral seekwens iz sumthin what kin aktualy exist, ya know, thet thar w+w*, an whatever all else kind'er nonsense, (Ah wuz gonna say bullshit, but ah decided thet wudn't be perlite), all you'n filosofers iz all th' time gettin yursefs inta.
So's anyways, ya'll keep on 'a talkin bout temporal sequences, an wether ur not G exists inside a, ur outsid'a time. Now if'n G iz outsid'a time, or time has no meanin ta G, ah gots ta say, ignorant as ah is, how kin it be thet he's decidin at what point ta kreate, since, if'n G iz outsid's a time, or iz non-temporal, then Gs choozin ta do somethin, well shoot fahr, choozin ta do anythin, at some pertikular point in time, iz, mor ur less, kinda impossible, logically, ur whatever.
An then therz thet thar thang bout everythin what begins ta exist haz ta haz a cause.
Sept that's not true, as anyone what has even a little bit oh smarts regardin quantum this, that, an the other, kin tell ya. Quantum stuff happens all th time with no "cause" at all so fars we kin determine. It just happens. Ya know, sorta like shit.
Then there's thet thar vacuum energy, an them thar virtual partikuls, what pops inter an outa existenz with no cause a' tall what anyone kin determine. We knows they'z thar on akounta thet thar kazimir effect, which has done been measured. So'z it wood seem they'z real az anythin what we kin touch. (which iz mor 'an anyone kin say bout G!)
Still, al th' time they's arguin bout temporal this, an temporal that, an we don't even know what time IS! beyount "it's what you measure with a clock." Time? It's right up thar with quantum gravity fer as mysterious iz consarned! Ya'll iz spendin all this hyar smoke an energy arguin bout G this, an G that, an temporal this an temporal that, an ya'll don't even know what time iz!
But see, ah allus comes to a stop what with thet thar Kalam argyument with the very first premise, "everything that begins to exist has a cause."
On account'a, where's yer proof? Contrarywise ta ya'lls assumption, ah don't take thet as self evident.
Plus, tho ya'll il say "that's different" ya'lls G is presumed to neither have, nur need, a cause.
So's anyways, ya'll keep on 'a talkin bout temporal sequences, an wether ur not G exists inside a, ur outsid'a time. Now if'n G iz outsid'a time, or time has no meanin ta G, ah gots ta say, ignorant as ah is, how kin it be thet he's decidin at what point ta kreate, since, if'n G iz outsid's a time, or iz non-temporal, then Gs choozin ta do somethin, well shoot fahr, choozin ta do anythin, at some pertikular point in time, iz, mor ur less, kinda impossible, logically, ur whatever.
An then therz thet thar thang bout everythin what begins ta exist haz ta haz a cause.
Sept that's not true, as anyone what has even a little bit oh smarts regardin quantum this, that, an the other, kin tell ya. Quantum stuff happens all th time with no "cause" at all so fars we kin determine. It just happens. Ya know, sorta like shit.
Then there's thet thar vacuum energy, an them thar virtual partikuls, what pops inter an outa existenz with no cause a' tall what anyone kin determine. We knows they'z thar on akounta thet thar kazimir effect, which has done been measured. So'z it wood seem they'z real az anythin what we kin touch. (which iz mor 'an anyone kin say bout G!)
Still, al th' time they's arguin bout temporal this, an temporal that, an we don't even know what time IS! beyount "it's what you measure with a clock." Time? It's right up thar with quantum gravity fer as mysterious iz consarned! Ya'll iz spendin all this hyar smoke an energy arguin bout G this, an G that, an temporal this an temporal that, an ya'll don't even know what time iz!
But see, ah allus comes to a stop what with thet thar Kalam argyument with the very first premise, "everything that begins to exist has a cause."
On account'a, where's yer proof? Contrarywise ta ya'lls assumption, ah don't take thet as self evident.
Plus, tho ya'll il say "that's different" ya'lls G is presumed to neither have, nur need, a cause.
Which sorta blows yer first premise out'n th' water, (ur wuter, az they'ns sez in delaware), leastwise fer those ah us'ns what is too ignurent an simple ta understands the sutilty a yur argument explainin' how come G is exempt from yer first premise.
Now, ah's red lot'sa highfalutin language explicatin how come makin G exempt from the first premise don't render it false, but ya know somethin?
Pilin shit higher an deeper don't change th' fact that it's still shit.
An, as anyone whats spent time in farm country kin tell ya,
Now, ah's red lot'sa highfalutin language explicatin how come makin G exempt from the first premise don't render it false, but ya know somethin?
Pilin shit higher an deeper don't change th' fact that it's still shit.
An, as anyone whats spent time in farm country kin tell ya,
the higher the pahl gits,
th worser it smells.
No comments:
Post a Comment